Author: joshr

Access Protected

You must be logged in and have purchased one of the following products to view this content

You can login here if you are a returning customer

 A. No. We have the accumulated data of many thousands of installations, some since 1984. For example, here’s a video of my 1983 Honda Civic (click)
In addition, we have had world class mechanics test the combustion enhancement techniques we’ve developed.
They tell us they learned more from our literature than they were taught while learning to be a mechanic. They installed and use our technology.
In all the years and thousands of installations our technology (properly applied) has not damaged a single engine.

 A.   The quick answer is:
If you have fuel still burning as it is going past the exhaust valves, they will burn.’Lean’ burning that causes engine damage is addressed in our books. 
Eagle-Research fuel savers completely bypass the issue.  If you follow our instructions your engine will run cooler, not hotter… and your exhaust NOx will drop dramatically.
 
The more comprehensive answer (covered in more detail in our books) is:
Givens:1. ONLY vapor fuel can burn.2. Fuel can only burn in a narrow air:fuel mixture range.3. ONLY the fuel that is vapor when the spark plug fire actually powers your engine. 4. OEM fuel systems actually vaporize only a small percentage of the fuel before the spark plug fires. 
During the initial combustion (of the vapor fuel) the liquid portion of the fuel then turns to vapor and burns.  The problem is that this process takes about 25 milliseconds and most engines only have about 7 milliseconds before the exhaust valves open.  So fuel would be burning out past the exhaust valves; burning them up and creating huge volumes of NOx.
OEM fuel systems prevent valves being burned (and excess NOx) by ADDING extra liquid fuel.  When the initial combustion (fuel that was vapor when the spark plug fired) then turns the liquid fuel to vapor, the resulting mixture is now too ‘rich’ to burn; and the fire is quenched.
BUT now excessive hydrocarbons are going out into the environment.  These ‘excess’ hydrocarbons are burned in your catalytic converter.  This is a pet peeve of mine, because I believe fuel should be burned in the engine, where it can be converted into power.
There is another, more efficient method, that has been suppressed since the late 1800s…
Eagle-Research technology makes the engine use less fuel, but in ways that actually RICHEN the initial explosive mixture, three examples, depending on the technology:
1. We produce more vapor fuel from the same volume/mass of fuel going into the engine; so less liquid fuel is required to produce the same power.
2. Our combustion enhancement techniques cause the fuel to be burned more efficiently (faster, more complete and at the right time) so the exhaust gases leaving the combustion chamber are hundreds of degrees cooler than before the technology is applied.
3. We use water Injection to both increase combustion efficiency AND to replace the liquid portion of the fuel that OEM was using to ‘quench’ the flame.  During the initial combustion, the liquid water is turned to steam, which quenches the flame.  You don’t need to use liquid gasoline to quench the flame…
All this can be easily verified using the colortune sparkplugs (explained in the books) and a pyrometer or simple thermometer in your exhaust pipe.  If you see a white flame in the colortunes or your exhaust temperatures rise, you are too lean and not quenching the ‘excess’ combustion.
The conclusion is that our technologies have addressed the ‘lean burn’ question to the extent that, if you follow our instructions, it is nearly impossible to create a condition that will damage your engine by excess exhaust heat.
Learn more about why and how fuel can be reduced download Double Mileage Guaranteed (Part 1) 

A. The HyCO 2DT atomizes (using turbo air pressure) a portion of the fuel (diesel or gasoline) that is returning to the fuel tanks and then feeds the atomized fuel into the turbocharger intake (to be homogenized with air).
The net result is adding fuel vapor into the cylinder before the injector squirts.
The fuel vapors promote faster, smoother and more complete combustion.
Fuel can burn only when it is in a vapor state and mixed with oxygen. It takes time for the injected fuel to vaporize, mix with air and combust.  So pre-vaporizing a portion of the fuel and homoginizing it with air decreases the time needed for complete combustion.  More of the fuel combusts AT THE OPTIMUM TIME to convert heat to mechanical power. 
The pre-vaporized diesel fuel (now coming in with thae air charge) is too lean to initiate combustion as the piston compresses the mixture, so it will not pre-ignite too soon.  
When the liquid fuel is sprayed into the cylinder, via the injectors, the mixture becomes rich enough to combust and the whole mixture combusts quicker and more completely at the right time.  
The rapid pressure buildup in the cylinder (during combustion) helps ‘hold back’ some fuel from being injected, which is why dyno operators consistently note that even while the throttle is held at ‘full fuel rail’ the fuel consumption DROPS even as power increases.
Increased combustion efficiency achieves greater power, fuel economy and lower pollution.  Independent tests show 10-15% fuel economy gains in large truck engines (12 to 16 liter), with a 10-15% increase in power at the same time.  Pollution levels drop dramatically.
The HyCO 2DT can also be used (as a separate unit, not integrated into the vehicle fuel system) to add gasoline, alcohol and/or water injection.
Here is a calculator to find out how much money you’ll save.Adjust the percentage to fit whatever technology you are using.https://www.eagle-research.com/fuelsav/FiveYrCalc.php 

Access Protected

You must be logged in and have purchased one of the following products to view this content

You can login here if you are a returning customer

Access Protected

You must be logged in and have purchased one of the following products to view this content

You can login here if you are a returning customer

We, of course, recommend our own; which we think is the best technology on the market.  If something comes on the market that we think is better than what we offer, we will either improve ours (we’re constantly improving anyway) or recommend the better product.
In the meantime, here is a flowchart to help you choose from our technologies.
Here is a calculator to find out how much money you’ll save.Adjust the percentage to fit whatever technology you are using.https://www.eagle-research.com/fuelsav/FiveYrCalc.php 

A. Yes, here’s the story
In 1993 I had a friend who challenged me to create a practical fuel saver for trucks.  The deal was that he would sell them and give me a royalty.  I revived a line of experimenting I had started in 1990 and met the challenge. We (together) proved it out on several test trucks.  He then decided not to proceed with marketing (for reasons that had nothing to do with the technology); and the HyCO 2DT technology has sat ‘on my shelf’ until NOW!
During the couple of decades since we proved the HyCO 2DT technology effective and practical but, if anyone wanted one on their turbocharged engine they had to build it themselves from my HyCO 2DT Manual.  Lots of truckers have, around the world.
Over the years several people have approached me asking if they could manufacture, I’ve always said yes and they’ve always NOT followed through; until NOW.  In 2012 two people consulted with me and over the next couple of years (as we’ve had time) we’ve developed TWO manufacturers of the HyCO 2DT canisters.  They incorporate all the technology upgrades we’ve learned over the last couple of decades,  They are ready to sell as of February, 2014 (subject to inventory).
American versionhttps://www.eagle-research.com/cms/node/2634 
Columbian versionhttps://www.eagle-research.com/cms/node/2639 
HyCO 2DT online Resourceshttps://www.eagle-research.com/cms/resources/hyco-2dt
Eagle-Research eStorehttps://www.eagle-research.com/cms/store/fuel-savers
George Wiseman Consultationhttps://www.eagle-research.com/cms/node/258
Eagle-Research eNewshttps://www.eagle-research.com/cms/eagle-research-enotices

A. Eagle-Research defines Brown’s Gas (aka BG, HHO or HydrOxy) as:

“A mixture of combustible gasses coming out of an electrolyzer that is specifically designed to electrolyze (split) water and to NOT separate the resulting gasses from each other.”

Electrolysis splits water into hydrogen and oxygen by inserting two electrodes into a solution containing a catalyst and water; then running direct current through the solution.
Hydrogen evolves from the negative electrode (cathode) and oxygen evolves from the positive electrode (anode).  There are many catalyst choices.

The difference between traditional and Brown’s Gas (BG) electrolyzers is a ‘membrane’ in the solution between the cathode and anode.
The membrane traditionally separates the hydrogen and oxygen into two separate streams.

BG electrolyzers do not have a membrane, so all gasses generated come out the same hose.  

Because there is no membrane to interrupt the process, the BG electrolysis can make a third gas, a negatively charged plasma form of water (H2O with extra electrons we call Electrically Expanded Water (ExW)), evolving directly out of the solution (not associated with either electrode); making the BG uniquely different from a traditional H2:O2 mixture.

Brown’s Gas is a ratio of 2 parts hydrogen to 1 part oxygen and usually contains a significant water vapor component.

Brown’s Gas is made using water and electricity in specially designed electrolyzers, like our AquaCure.

Research indicates that Brown’s Gas has characteristics that cannot be achieved by simply mixing bottled hydrogen and oxygen in a stoichiometric ratio.

BG contains H, H2, O, O2, H2O (as water vapor) and a special 6th ‘structured’ gas that shows up in ‘dried gas’ as water vapor; https://eagle-research.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/Browns-Gas-Spectroscopy.pdf
Chris Eckman calls this 6th constituent “linear water isomer with extra electrons, stable in a Rydberg Cluster”,  professor Ruggero Santilli calls them ‘Magnecules’ and George Wiseman calls it ‘Electrically Expanded Water’ (ExW) ExW is a negatively charged plasma form of water.

Matter exists in 4 ‘states’  Solid, Liquid, Gas and Plasma.

The 4th state of water (ExW) seems to act like a ‘glue’ that holds ‘structures’ of water together, which is why we think atomic oxygen and hydrogen can exist in a stable form.  These structures of H and O atoms (Yull Brown called a fluid crystal) can be large enough to be heavier than air.

ExW gives Brown’s Gas unique properties associated with extra electrons… Like voltage generation or increasing EZ (Exclusion Zone) Gel formation.

Here is a 2019 Presentation, George Wiseman gave at an international conference on water in Germany.

Here are George Wiseman’s early theories of what Brown’s Gas may be…
Here is George Wiseman’s 2017 presentation.
Note that he introduced the initial version of AquaCure at ‘less than cost’ to get beta testers.  The feedback gave us the AquaCure we have today.

BG is also known under brand names like: Common-Ducted Gas, Rhode’s Gas, Spirig Gas, HydrOxy, Brown Gas, Green Gas, Klein Gas, Aquygen, HHO, SG Gas, Ohmasa Gas, Knallgas, HNG and (erroneously by WikiPedia) OxyHydrogen.

Here is a research synopsis from Moray King
Water Electrolyzers and Zero-Point Energy

Here is a peer-reviewed discussion about Brown’s Gas for health:
http://www.waterjournal.org/volume-11/mohaupt

OxyHydrogen is the name of mixed molecular hydrogen (H2) and molecular oxygen (O2) in ratio of 2H2:O2, as you can achieve by mixing bottled gasses OR by electrolyzers with a membrane that separates the hydrogen and oxygen, such as PEM:SPE electrolyzers; which OFTEN erroneously call their mixture ‘Brown’s Gas…
Just mixing pure hydrogen and oxygen is NOT Brown’s Gas because it does not contain the electron rich ExW.
https://eagle-research.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Spanish-Study.docx

Short History of Browns Gas

Brown’s Gas was originally patented in the 1960’s
https://patents.google.com/patent/US3310483A/en
The late William Rhodes, of Pheonix Arizona, was awarded the patent 3,310,483 for ‘Multicell OxyHydrogen Generator’ on March 21, 1967 and he called it ‘single-ducted gas‘.

Not much happened with the gas until the late Yull Brown (then in Australia) in the 1970’s patented his own machine for making it.
https://patents.google.com/patent/US4014777A/en
and started to commercialize the gas for various applications (mostly to replace torch fuel gasses like acetylene).  He spent the next 30 years of his life traveling the world, selling his technology and developing variations of his machines.

Yull Brown was particularly effective in the Orient, where China (in particular) was undergoing a MASSIVE buildup and they adopted the Brown’s Gas as a standard welding gas instead of developing an acetylene infrastructure.

During most of that time the single-ducted gas was generally known as ‘Brown’s Gas‘.

After that, several people started making variations of Brown’s Gas machines and many of them ‘brand-named’ the gas (it’s all the same gas) to try to get unique market share.
The first variation was HydrOxy, from Alvin Crosby of New Zealand, who was a distributor of Yull Brown but was unhappy with Yull’s machine’s design and made a better one.

I’ve been working with Brown’s Gas since 1986 and I’ve used the name ‘Brown’s Gas’ to honor the inventor that commercialized it AND because it’s important (less confusion) to keep the same name for the same gas.
The world would NOT know of this gas if it wasn’t for Yull Brown’s effort over the last 30 years of his life.

My version of a Brown’s Gas electrolyzer was half the weight, half the size and produced more gas with half the electricity.  It also was simpler, more manufacturable and safer to use.

The name HHO popped into existence via the late Denny Klein just before the huge raise in oil prices in 2007-2008.  Denny was featured on FOX News at the time, so the gas got a lot of good publicity with the trade name HHO.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Rb_rDkwGnU

One of the excellent applications of BG is for combustion enhancement (typical 25% reduction in fuel consumption) so when Ozzie Freeman put out an eBook on how to DIY apply HHO to your vehicle and sold over a million copies, the name HHO was then ‘cemented’ in the public consciousness.

There’s lots more to the history, but that’s the gist.

All the ‘trade names’ are for the same gas,
… though Brown’s Gas can vary in QUALITY depending on the quantity (percentage) of Electrically Expanded Water (ExW) contained in the mixture.

More George Wiseman Brown’s Gas Presentations:

2001 KeeylyNet Conference

2007 Nexus Conference

2014 Tesla Tech Part 1

2014 TeslaTech Part 2

2017 TeslaTech

2018 TeslaTech

2019 TeslaTech

2019 Water Conference in Germany

Some of George Wiseman’s Brown’s Gas Interviews:

George Wiseman on BitChute

With Mark Kent of Osmio

With Mark Kent and Dr. Jon Xue Zhang

With Mark Kent and Clive De Carle

With Clive de Carle

With Nathalie Niddam

With Greg Carlwood of HigherSideChats    Folllowup Show

With Kevin Shelton of Epigeneering

FAQ: with Fringe Energy

With Justin Stellman of Extreme Health Radio

Justin Stellman of Extreme Health Radio #3 (EP #734)

With Odessa Orlewicz of Librti part 1

With Odessa Orlewicz of Librti part 2 (Q&A)       Librti June 29, 2022 (further Q&A) 

With Karen Elkins 

With Lynnie Wennerstrom of LynnieMotivates.com

With Andrew Scheim of Blue Z Water

With Benjamin Balderson of Odin’s Alchemy

With David Drimmel of Healevations

The Crow Show   (all episodes with George Wiseman)

With Rob Edward of Dig Within

With Chance Garton of InnerVerse

P.A.T LIFE Podcast #2

Conversations with Dr. Tom Cowan

The Hellenic Wolf videos:  Full,  Patents, Intro, History, ExW,

Kaleb Davis Episode EP-07

AlfaVedic with Dr. Barre Lando and Mike Winters

Conversation with Prof. Gerald Pollack and Mark Kent

STERN (anti-Cancer) WEBINAR 2 WHY Brown’s Gas is better than pure hydrogen

Vonu PodCast  (Brown’s Gas as a potential energy source)

Advertisement: Interview with Jordan Jay of United Fight Alliance

FAQ #1

I came across this site making claims that were in some contrast to my understanding about Browns Gas–

What is Brown’s Gas?

Am I missing something?

Nope, even the title premise is incorrect.

 
Not directly, for several reasons:
1. Brown’s Gas should be considered to be an ‘electrical’ flame, not a BTU flame.  It’s dominant energy is electrical, not thermal, in nature.  Brown’s Gas does not efficiently heat air or water, such mediums dissipate the electrical energy with minimal temperature rise.
2. Brown’s Gas also burns MUCH faster than regular furnace gasses like natural gas or propane and would result in furnaces, designed for slower burning fuels, to explode.
3. BG takes more energy to make than you get back from it (burning it directly and alone as a fuel).
4. Lots of people try heating a secondary material (like copper or magnesium oxide) with Brown’s Gas, and then having that material heat the air or water (there’s even patents for this technique).  
While this technique is more efficient at heating than the ‘bare’ flame, I have not yet seen any proof that this ‘Rube Goldberg’ and expensive technique is more efficient than simply putting the electricity (needed to make the Brown’s Gas anyway) directly into a simple, efficient and inexpensive off-the-shelf resistive element.  
There are scam plans on the internet that use BG (HHO) to heat copper pipes… YES, BG will heat copper pipes and a fan blowing through the pipes will blow the heat into the room; BUT does it really take only 300 watts of energy to make 6000 watts of heat?  No one has yet proven that to me and I haven’t had time to verify the rumors myself.
So NO… Brown’s Gas isn’t practical to use as a ‘stand alone’ fuel in regular gas furnaces. BUT
The EXCEPTION is that Brown’s Gas acts like a catalyst to increase the efficiency of hydrocarbon-fuel combustion.  If you use Brown’s Gas IN ADDITION TO a hydrocarbon fuel, then good things happen.
Here is proof that BG assists carbon-fuel combustion, download PDF
We have been with using Brown’s Gas to increase the efficiency of internal combustion and then add water to compensate for the fuel mass that we have reduced (water replaces the volume of fuel normally used as the combustion ‘cooling’ fluid).  We have the world’s best such technology and we describe it in our ‘Brown’s Gas’, ‘HyZor Technology’, ‘Water Injection’ and ‘Super Gas Saver Secrets’ books.  This is in ADDITION to the gains you can achieve by burning fuel efficiently.
The catalytic effect works at the molecular level, helping the fuel’s atomic bonds to break with less energy input.  I call it ‘lowering the combustion self-propagating endothermic energy requirement’.  Thus, when the fuel burns, the combustion requires less of the heat energy produced to keep the combustion happening.  This allows (for the same fuel mass) more (exothermic) energy to be released as heat.  The quantity of additional heat energy released is far greater than the energy we use to make the Brown’s Gas.  Of course, less efficient technologies than ours have less gain.  
Note: The actual energy put in (to make Brown’s Gas) is 98% recovered in the combustion process; that’s another reason why the catalytic enhancement shows up as a significant ‘free energy’ gain as heat.
Our research so far indicates that this catalytic effect is much more effective on long chain hydrocarbons.  So Methane (and Compressed Natural Gas) has the least gain, Gasoline (Petrol) has a greater gain, Diesel has a very good gain (around 50%) and heavy oils (like the crude used to fuel ocean going ships) get the greatest gain (can replace up to 90% of fuel with water).  Coal combustion is enhanced too.  All this assumes, of course, proper implementation of the technology.
This data is based on our own internal combustion research and on data acquired from various other sources that add hydrogen to assist carbon-fuel combustion.  Our research has been done at ratios from about 5,000:1 carbon-fuel:Brown’s Gas.  It is true that higher concentrations of Brown’s Gas result in even more fuel savings, but there is an optimum ratio for any given application (we are still researching to find that ratio).  After the volume of BG required for the catalytic effect is optimized, any additional BG results in mileage lost (in internal combustion applications) and reduction in combustion temperature (in external combustion applications).
Because we were initially researching with increasing the efficiency of internal combustion in mobile applications, we were limited in by the vehicle’s electrical input.  Stationary applications are not so limited.  Since the actual energy put in (to make Brown’s Gas) is recovered in the combustion process, and the electricity didn’t come at such a dear price as in vehicle applications (up to 14 watts of fuel burned to make 1 watt of BG), there is a much greater potential for profitable efficiency gains in stationary applications (where the electricity to make the BG comes from the Grid).
I’m able to replace 50% of my Natural Gas in my shop with Brown’s Gas and still retain all the original equipment.  By measuring the temperature of the air coming out of the furnace, I find the actual heating value of the mixture is exactly the same as the original NG alone (even though, by volume, BG has only 1/3 the ‘BTU’ value of NG; about 10 BTU per liter for BG and 30 BTU per liter for NG). Putting in more BG than 50% changes the combustion flame too much and the gas becomes incompatible with the furnace (can cause explosions).
Because of the cost of my electricity, water and Natural Gas, BG costs me only 10% of the NG.  Every liter of gas I replace with BG saves me 90% of the cost of the NG.  My electricity is $0.06 per kilowatthour.  Water is $2 per 18 liters (about 5 gallons).  Our WaterTorches make 1860 liters of gas for every liter of water put into them.  Our WaterTorches use less than 2 watthours (convert to MMW) to make each liter of gas.
I see absolutely no reason that the same setup couldn’t be used with propane.  We simply plumb the BG (out from the WaterTorch) into the furnace-gas flow just before the furnace-gas burner shutoff switch (I also add a special bubbler (to prevent backfire and gather excess moisture), a check valve (to prevent furnace-gas from escaping if the BG is disconnected) and a shutoff valve (normal for any gas appliance)).  The BG then mixes with the furnace-gas before it goes into the burner, both enhancing the combustion of the furnace-gas and partially replacing it.
The WaterTorch is easily set for producing an exact volume of gas, and the pressure will rise to just above the furnace-gas pressure (coming from the final stage regulator) automatically, so a precise balance (and ratio) of BG to furnace-gas is simple and automatic.  The WaterTorch is slightly modified (easily done) for automatic shutoff when your furnace shuts off and for automatic water fill.
I’m doing it.  It’s simple.  I see no reason that would prevent anyone from doing it (besides perhaps officials getting concerned because they don’t know what’s happening safety wise and the utility might change your meter, thinking the old one went bad (they did that with mine).  This next Winter I’ll have it in my home as well as my shop.
On the subject of safety.  In every way, BG is safer than NG, or Propane.  It is lighter than air, it simply cannot build up a combustible concentration in a room that has even the simplest ventilation (cracks allowing air to move).  BG is produced on demand, there is no stored gas.  Our WaterTorches (electrolyzers) are designed extremely strong, well able to contain any internal explosions, usually without damage.