NEWS FLASH:
New evidence of the unique properties of Brown’s Gas
The current theory of Brown’s Gas states that Brown’s Gas is a mixture of di-atomic and mon-atomic hydrogen and oxygen. Brown’s Gas, Book One explains it in detail, but here is a peek.
The simplest way to make Brown’s Gas is to use an electrolyzer, which uses electricity to split water into its elements of hydrogen and oxygen. At the instant that the water splits, the hydrogen and oxygen are in their mon-atomic state, this is H for hydrogen and O for oxygen.
Normal electrolyzers encourage the hydrogen and oxygen to drop to their di-atomic state. Di-atomic means the hydrogen formed H2 and the oxygen formed O2. The di-atomic state is a lower energy state, the energy difference shows up as heat in the electrolyzer. This energy is now unavailable to the flame.
WHAT IF a significant number of these H and O atoms did not reform into di-atomic molecules? We start by adding 442.4 Kcal per mole to split water using electrolysis. This is an endothermic (energy absorbing) action. But if we have no, or little, ‘re-bonding’ into di-atomic molecules, then our electrolyzer wouldn’t heat up, because there would be no exothermic reaction that would cause excess heat, beyond the agitation of the fluid by the bubbles. This ‘lack of heat’ in the electrolyzer is what I noted in my experiments that actually produced Brown’s Gas.
There would also be a significantly larger volume of gas produced by the electrolyzer, well beyond any reasonable expectation of a ‘normal’ electrolyzer. The mon-atomic moles would take up twice the volume that the di-atomic moles for the same weight of water electrolyzed.
Eagle-Research experiments verify this: — not to that efficiency, but much more volume than you could expect by assuming a maximum efficiency to a normal electrolyzer. The math and experiments are well documented in Brown’s Gas, Book One. For a quick example, let’s use the results of an independent test of Brown’s Gas by an engineer named Harald Hanisch.
Mr. Hanisch was Director of Research and Development of Simmering-Graz-Pauker, a large machine-building and railway-car manufacturer owned by the Austrian government. He couldn’t believe that oxygen and hydrogen could be mixed and burned safely and he certainly would not believe that Yull Brown got any 340 liters of gas per kilowatthour. Mr. Hanisch decided to go to Australia to see for himself. He wanted to test for himself the actual input of electricity and the actual output of gas. During his actual testing, with the water displacement method, he found Yull Brown’s machine produced 368 liters per kilowatthour.
Listed below are some of the myths and accompanying proofs associated with Brown’s Gas. Further information and further proof can be found in Brown’s Gas Book 1 & 2.
We’re not trying to slam Brown’s Gas, just the opposite. Brown’s Gas, like anything else, has it’s appropriate uses. People have assumed uses that are impractical and I simply point these out so that the gas can be used in it’s most practical applications (see Fabulous Uses).
Desalination
Here we discuss the impracticality of using Brown's Gas to desalinate or purify water.
Atmospheric Engine
We point out a serious miscalculation from Yull Brown that allowed some people to think that Brown's Gas could be used in an over-unity fashion - using the earth's atmospheric pressure to run an implosion engine.
Implosions
Though it is possible to make Brown's Gas implode, mostly it explodes.
Powering Vehicles
We show why it is not yet practical to run a vehicle on water, even using Brown's Gas. But there is HOPE, see what I mean.
Home Uses
There are very few places where I'd use Brown's Gas in the home. It's unique characteristics make it very impractical and dangerous in home use applications.