|

Why
I don't patent . . .
- George
Wiseman -




-George
Wiseman-
I get
several major personal advantages by not
patenting free energy
technologies:
I actually make more immediate money for my
research, by having product for sale (books and
devices).
I sleep well at night with no concern about
anyone making my devices for resale, I encourage
independent manufacture of my technology. People
can't steal what I give away.
Of
course, I concentrate my help and advise on
those that help me in return.
I'm not concerned about the technology being
lost if I 'disappear,' because it's already out
there and being used. It's very sad how much
valuable information has been lost by inventors
taking it with them to their grave.
The technology gets put in place by people who
make money. So I don't have to expend my time
selling, I spend my time making better
products.
In any
case, the main point
is,
the technology makes
it to
the market.
This
point is vital; my 'not
patenting'
philosophy
actually
gets the
technology
onto the
market,
whereas
THOUSANDS
of energy
products
registered in the
patent
office are
NOT on
the market.
This should
be important to YOU, as YOU are the one who most
benefits.
Myth: If
it's patented, it's
Government
approved.
Fact:
The patent Office has
nothing
to do with
government
safety
approvals.
This is done
by
agencies like UL,
CSA or
EPA.
Myth:
If it's not patented, maybe there's something
wrong with it.
Fact:
A patent has absolutely nothing to do with the
practicality of the product. Marketability is
decided using the actual products
merits.
Myth:
A patent protects my innovation.
Fact:
A patent is (at best) only one step up from
absolutely no protection
Fact:
In some cases a patent is the worst thing you
could possibly do if you want
protection
Fact:
A patent makes your idea public knowledge,
allowing anyone access to your thoughts and
helping them develop something better. Might as
well write a book.
Fact:
With a 10% change, someone else could acquire a
similar patent or produce your idea with no
liability to you
Fact:
The only assistance you will get from the Patent
Office to fight patent violations is
verification of your patent date.
Myth:
You can't get investors if you don't
patent.
Fact:
Investors come when they see money. Show them
the potential and they'll invest. A patent is
only one 'protection' tool.
Myth:
I can make money once I have a
patent.
Fact:
A patent does not gaurentee income of any
kind.
Fact:
A patent often prevents income for years because
you must maintain total secrecy.
Fact:
A patent costs thousands of dollars, which is
likely to be totally lost.
Most
patent owners never make a dime.
Fact:
If you want world-wide protection, you must file
(and pay for) a separate patent in every single
country.
Myth:
Patenting is industry standard.
Fact:
Knowledgeable industry makes minimal use of
patents, preferring trade secrets, contracts and
non-disclosures.
Sadly,
many people, including inventors and investors,
are trapped in 'greed' thinking. Greed thinking
is based on 'limited resource' or 'scarcity'
mentality. Thinking that we must protect our
assets because there is only so much (of
anything) to go around.
Greed
makes vested interest suppression possible and
practical. Preventing technology from getting
into public use. 'Vested interest' knows the
inventor didn't tell anyone because he was
greedy, making the suppression easy. Vested
interest is extremely good at finding a weak
point (to push on) in any person's life that
will cause that person to become unviable; so
most inventors don't even realize the power they
are up against.
|
|
MAKE
MONEY WITHOUT
PATENTING!!!
To continue
inventing practical energy solutions, I make
money immediately by selling books and kits,
instead of spending thousands of dollars and
years of time getting a patent.
Investing
the time and money into getting a patent does
not give any guarantee you'll make money.
Selling books and product makes money
immediately.
Investing
the time and money (that you would have spent
acquiring a patent) into product development
instead, will give you a much better chance
of getting the product into the marketplace
and give you money in your
pocket.
Not to say
that patents aren't an applicable tool in
some situations, they just aren't good for
inventors in my situation. Nondisclosure
agreements, trademarks and copyrights are
inexpensive, fast, sufficient and reasonable
protection.Several inventors have now seen
what I've accomplished and are switching to
my methods.
CAN
YOU FIGHT?
A patent is only
as good as your ability to fight for it. The
patent office does not help you, except to
provide a service to prove that you patented
your device on a particular date.
You fight your
opponent in court at your own expense. Your
chance of winning is not assured because there
are many slippery ways around the patent
laws.
So you may have
paid lots of money getting a patent, set your
marketing back several years because of secrecy
and STILL not be able to prevent competition. In
fact, you spend even more money (and time)
trying to defend the undefendable.
Patents are an
exceptionally bad idea for innovators with
limited funds. Often Patents are 'stolen' and
used without the innovators concent because the
thief knows that the innovator does not have the
money to take them to court.
PATENTS
ARE TIME LIMITED
Patents are only
good for about 20 years from date of filing (not
issue).
Patents need to
be separately patented in every country or
companies in another country can use your ideas
freely, with no compensation to you.
Copyrights are
good for 50 years after the author's death; are
automatically valid in over 100 countries; and
cost only $20 to register. It makes sense to
write books!
ADVANTAGES
OF SHARING
By
sharing our research publicly we are put in
contact with like-minded people around the
world, who also share their ideas. This takes
years off the research time to develop the
best answers in the world.
Then we share
the results with everyone by writing a book.
Everybody benefits because each person that
contributed gets the benefits of everyone else's
contribution too. This has turned into an
awesome tool for developing technologies
quickly.
Patent Free
sharing and open cooperation are vital to
developing and implementing energy
alternatives in today's suppressive
environment.
People who
read our literature can build the technology
themselves and participate in the free
sharing of information. This brings the
technology forward at a speed far faster than
any previous method. Technology reaches the
public in a practical form in months instead
of decades.
People who
have our literature and do not build the
technology become customers for those that do
build the technology. Public education
creates a market for the products of the
innovation.
Technology
develops much faster when ideas are freely
shared. Greed stunts the growth potential of
a technology by using ideas from only one
place.
For example:
we developed the Brown's Gas technology to a
practical state, using ideas from all over
the world. The technology continues to
develop at an amazing rate because people are
sharing their knowledge and experience. Now
everyone gets the benefit of that
cooperation.
BY-PASS
PATANT OFFICE SUPPRESSION
It is this
author's conclusion, having studied this effect
extensively, that some technology is actively
suppressed by the patent office. Example:
'over-unity machines' are not allowed to be
patented by Patent Office policy (Note that I
said 'policy' not Law).
This is
ridiculous because the Patent Office has no
function except to record and file patents in
case someone needs them in a lawsuit and for
public viewing. It's up to the market to
determine if a device works or not. If it
doesn't work, it won't sell. If someone commits
fraud, they get punished.
The biggest
irony is that most of the actual patents
that I've seen DO NOT WORK as they are outlined
in the patent; as anyone who has tried to build
a device from a patent can tell you. So to make
a policy against patenting anything is bad news,
... very bad news and contains a message
...
There is a man
with a proven over-unity machine that has been
trying to patent it for over twenty years. A
court of law told the patent office to issue him
a patent and they STILL wouldn't do it. He has
tried to go directly to Congress for a patent,
bypassing the patent office. You don't have the
benefit of this man's work because he want's to
patent it before he'll produce the device
commercially. The concept does work, I've seen
it myself and participated in the testing. I'm
not saying that it's practical yet because the
experimental machines are large for the power
output, but they do put out more useable
electricity than they consume. Sad... and only
one example...
BY-PASS
"VESTED-INTEREST"
SUPPRESSION
Everyone has
heard about 'vested interest' buying out
inventors, or the government seizing a patent in
the interest of national security. These things
DO happen to certain inventions (like free
energy technologies) and it is made worse by
patenting, because 'vested interest' knows that
to qualify for a patent you haven't told anyone,
so the idea stops right there.
You should be
aware that the Patent Office has a program, that
anyone can subscribe to, which notifies the
subscriber when anyone is trying to get a patent
on the technology category they are interested
in. You can bet 'vested interest' subscribes to
this service. So the inventor notifies the
sharks, that he's ready to be eaten, by filing
for a patent.
Note: It isn't
that 'vested interest' can't make money with the
new technology, it's just that it costs money to
change and money that they've already invested
in the old technology would be lost. They call
it 'stranded investment'. So on the basis of
finances you don't have free energy that's
environmentally compatible and already exists.
It's really as simple as that.
TRUE
FREE MARKET
If someone can
develop and sell inventions better than mine,
they should do it. I sincerely believe in free
market competition. Free market is what we used
to have, it's what made America the greatest
superpower on earth. It's what we've lost (due
to suppression) and others have picked up, so
America is losing ground FAST.
I help
people make money by providing products that
help people save money, become more energy
independent and save the earth's
resources.
This
'marketing strategy' helps me become
successful in implementing eco-friendly
technologies because the people who make
money want to make more money. Those people
watch me closely and when I make another
product or an improvement, it gets applied
worldwide immediately.
If you want
to make money, a patent is a minor issue.
Money is made by marketing the product. Those
who have the best product and marketing will
make the money. It also helps to be first and
biggest. It also helps to be flexible, so you
can change constantly to give customers the
best product and service. This keeps you as
the leader, keeping the market share of the
competition limited.
PROTECTION
BY PUBLIC DOMAIN
Ironically it
has been my experience that making the
information public domain actually protects me
and those people who distribute my technology
several ways:
Industry is
loath to tool up when they think someone
(anyone) else may compete with them. They are
afraid of free market after having been
protected so long.
Greedy
thinking investors are loath to finance
technology that is public domain. In spite of
the fact that most patents are bypassed in one
way or another anyway. This is OK for me,
because I don't want the greedy thinking
investors involved with technologies I'm working
on. I want the abundance thinking
investors.
It becomes
redundant for 'vested interest' to try to
suppress a technology that has been spread
around the world. By making knowledge public
domain I'm spared 'suppression grief'. I may
make only crumbs, having given the cake away,
but those crumbs are all I need and I have
something more important, peace of mind
:)))
Information
that is public domain becomes forever
unpatentable by anyone. Or rather, someone could
get a patent because the patent office is
inefficient that way, but it would be thrown out
of court as a useless piece of paper as soon as
it was proved that the information was public
domain.
I've seen
inventors patent ideas that were already
patented (or ideas that are public domain) to
encourage investors to participate in marketing
their product. These patents are legal smoke and
are no protection, because the industry either
knows or can easily find out the truth. The one
left without protection is the investor, and the
inventor has actually committed
fraud.
There is very
little (of the technology that I work with) that
has not already been patented and expired,
making it public domain. Writing books is also
an excellent way to make information public
domain. No one can prevent use of this
information by patenting.
PROTECTION
BY INNOVATION
My ace in the
hole is that I am always making my products
better. This innovation is assisted by a
worldwide volunteer organization. If someone
starts selling my 'current' innovation, I can
sell a better one shortly. Best free market
:))))
In fact, my
innovations develop so fast that by the time a
book is written it is obsolete. It is still the
best printed information in the world, it is
just not the best I've got. So anyone who
markets (as competion) my technology, will
ALWAYS be behind.
In fact, I
encourage independent manufacture. Our time is
best spent doing innovation, not manufacture and
marketing. I also encourage manufacturers to
join our information sharing cooperative. Those
that share with us will be able to consult with
us to get the latest and best
information.
Those who
cooperate with our sharing techniques will be on
the leading edge. This is now a well proven
technique and is based on the solid fact that no
one person or organization can think of all
things. An organized, focused, self-interested
group of brainpower will always proceed
fastest.
Greedy,
secretive people who duplicate our technology
without being part of our sharing cooperative
are always going to be left behind. This has
already happened several times. Greed has it's
own way of thinking that automatically limits
the potential of any greedy individual or
organization.
INVEST
IN FUTURE
Patents are
useless when technology is developing so fast.
Time and money are resources wasted as the
patents become obsolete. If the time and money
is spent on development and sharing of ideas,
then the application develops past that stage
and everyone benefits.
By the time we
write a book or manufacture a product, the
technology has already grown past that point.
Why spend time and money patenting something
that is obsolete? Why patent a particular
technology when we already have something
better?
If innovation is
patented before we have a chance to make it
public domain, then we just figure out a method
that is better and make it public domain. This
makes their patent obsolete.
This is another
reason why it is so counterproductive to patent
technologies that are just developing. Others
can simply make a change and produce the product
anyway. In this case, the money and time spent
on a patent is worse than wasted, because it
could have been spent on product development and
marketing.
MARKETING
BY EDUCATION
All new
technology needs to educate the public before it
will be universally accepted. Writing books
automatically makes a market for the product
because people learn what the technology is and
how it can benefit them. It also establishes us
as an authority because we literally "wrote the
book".
The books start
the free exchange of information that results in
technology advancement and further books.
Eventually books are written that allow people
to build the projects themselves. This hands-on
experimentation feedback quickly refines
projects to make very practical applications.
The books are again updated to give everyone the
benefit of the best knowledge developed by free
exchange of information.
In the end, we
follow up the books with working devices. The
market has been created and the technology made
practical by patent free philosophy. Most people
do not have time or skills to build the projects
themselves, so huge market opportunities are
opened up. We either manufacture the products
ourselves or help others manufacture. We help
those that are willing to help us in
return.
Anyone who
duplicates our technology without being part of
our cooperative assists in promoting the
legitimacy of the new technology. It is in their
own self-interest to do so, because they have to
educate to public the same way to sell the same
technology.
PROSPERITY
Patent Free
philosophy is based on abundance mentality.
Abundance is all around us. We couldn't
possibly take advantage of it all because
it's like dipping a bucket of water out of
the ocean, the hole fills with more water.
Abundance takes many forms and presents many
opportunities. The key is to learn to
recognize and take advantage of the
opportunities as they present
themselves.
Looking at
Brown's Gas technology as an example. There is
enough business for everyone. The market is wide
open with opportunities on every side. We
recognise trillions of dollars of potential with
the market research we've already
done.
By not
patenting, the technology grows freely, finding
it's best applications without restriction. As
the technology gets implemented, it increases
productivity and creates employment. As ideas
are shared, the technology develops and new
applications are found. True abundance is shared
by all people because the standard of living
rises.
Patent Free
philosophy bypasses greed and suppression,
allowing a huge increase in the growth of the
technology. For example: Yull Brown spent
nearly 30 years and over $25 million dollars
trying to commercialize Brown's Gas using the
'patent' route. He spent a significant amount
of the money (and his time) on patents and
fighting patent infringements; he died
penniless.
The
technology is now developing so fast because
we are using the opposite philosophy that
Yull Brown used. Why keep using a philosophy
that obviously didn't work? If you want a
different result, change
something.
Eagle-Research
redeveloped the Brown's Gas technology from
scratch in eight months time, with a total
research budget of $6,000 per month. Yull
Brown was so secretive that he was no help to
us. Our machines were half the weight and
size; took half the wattage to make the same
volume of gas; operate quietly and have
safety features not found on any previous
designs. We were able to do this by openly
cooperating with anyone who is interested in
the technology. We finance the research by
selling the information (as books) and by
selling the world's best Brown's Gas
watertorches.
Abundance
mentality states, 'help others and you help
yourself'. This occurs directly by feedback from
those you helped and indirectly because your
contribution helped all of mankind and comes
back to you through multiple blessings. In the
Universe, every positive thought and action, no
matter how small, makes a significant
difference.
Check out our
Non-Disclosure
Page,
for an option to patenting.
|